Amistad con la nueva FSSPX ?

Por Padre Rafael, OSB (Prior Monasterio San José, Colombia)

 

 Monseñor Lefebvre declaró: “Fueron el concilio y sus FRUTOS los que causaron la destrucción de la Santa Misa, de nuestra Santa Fe, de nuestros catecismos y del reinado social  de Nuestro Señor Jesucristo” (19 de noviembre de 1989).
Con esta cita en mente, hagamos una analogía. La Santa Iglesia Católica es como el Árbol de la Vida (porque es la única fuente de vida espiritual y de salvación). La nueva religión del Vaticano II es como una mortal enfermedad que ha infectado progresivamente este Árbol (en su elemento humano)   a partir del concilio.
  Esta enfermedad conciliar ataca todo el Árbol (en su elemento humano) e incontables enemigos trabajan con la consciente intención de destruir el Árbol. La enfermedad está en el Árbol pero no es producto del Árbol. Esto es como el hecho de que la iglesia conciliar infecta el elemento humano de la Iglesia Católica desde dentro (como lo hace un virus en el cuerpo). Luego, los Católicos infectados son como “copias” del “virus”  y hacen una mayor propagación de la infección usando la propia estructura del Árbol (autoridad Católica y  jerarquía ocupadas ahora por liberales).
  Los papas conciliares son más responsables por cuidar el Árbol de la vida  y en lugar de eso están trabajando duro para propagar la infección al Árbol con la enfermedad mortal. Estos papas deben “rociar” el Árbol con “herbicida” para matar la  enfermedad, viz, condenando claramente los errores y resistiendo fuertemente a los enemigos de la Iglesia. Estos papas también deben “alimentar” y “regar” elÁrbol de la Vida(en su elemento humano) con Doctrina Católica Tradicional y los Sacramentos Verdaderos. En lugar, estos papas evitan que el Árbol (en su elemento humano) reciban más nutrición e hidratación.
  Muchos en la tan llamada  “resistencia interna” de la FSSPX desean “regar” el Árbol pero su trabajo es en vano  porque fracasan en su deber de pelear también contra la enfermedad invasora, esto es como cuando una ciudadela es sitiada, aquellos dentro de la ciudadela fracasan en su deber si  simplemente ¡plantan jardines y alimentan el ganado! Deben pelear contra los invasores con todas sus fuerzas.
  Como los enemigos conciliares de Nuestro Señor (Roma) promueven la “infecta” del Árbol (en su elemento humano), la nueva FSSPX los trata como si estuvieran peleando del lado de Nuestro Señor y se acerca a ellos en amistad sin exigirles primero su conversión. Por no resistir la difusión de la enfermedad la nueva FSSPX está cooperando en la destrucción del Árbol  y por lo tanto, ayudando a los enemigos de nuestro Señor.Incluso, dejando a lado el propio liberalismo afirmativo de la nueva FSSPX, la nueva FSSPX está cooperando con los destructores por omisión.
  Cada sacerdote de la FSSPX ahora escandaliza a los fieles por el solo hecho de su afiliación a ella, y cooperando con la FSSPX liberal, porque su filiación, asistencia y cooperación indican al mundo que condona y respalda el grupo y aquello que representa. Esto es como el escándalo que causa una persona que es miembro de un Partido Comunista, incluso si racionaliza su afiliación pensando  de sí mismo como parte del Partido de “resistencia interna”. Incluso, si un sacerdote de la FSSPX le indicara a algunas personas que está en desacuerdo con ciertas posiciones de la FSSPX, no sería suficiente porque ese sacerdote de la FSSPX es contado, enlistado e identificado internacionalmentecomo parte de la FSSPX.  Por lo tanto, el sacerdote es consideradointernacionalmente como soporte y cooperador con la nueva FSSPX.
  Además del escándalo causado simplemente por su filiación, los sacerdotes de la FSSPX de la tan  llamada “resistencia interna” fracasan en el deber de cada sacerdote y de cada Católico de resistir completamente a la enfermedad (modernismo, ecumenismo, liberalismo, etc.) y usar sus máximos esfuerzos para proteger todo el Árbol (el Bien Común de toda la Iglesia) y no simplemente proteger a sus propios amigos osu propia pequeña parroquia(su pequeña “rama” delÁrbol). Algunos en la tan llamada “resistencia interna” de la FSSPX “hablan claro” pero hablan tranquila y tímidamente lo suficiente para que sean tolerados por sus superiores liberales de la FSSPX.
  Los Católicos sin compromiso deben considerar esto como una “luz roja” a la asistencia a las misas de todos los sacerdotes de la FSSPX porque todos ellos cooperan con los enemigos de nuestro Señor, al menos por ser miembros de la nueva FSSPX y también por ablandar su oposición al liberalismo de la FSSPX al más bajo nivel tolerado por sus superiores FSSPX. Cualquier sacerdote de la FSSPX que cree que está hablando fuerte, en voz alta y continuamente contra el liberalismo de sus superiores de la FSSPX  se está engañando a sí mismo.
  Cualquier sacerdote que sin miedo se levante contra el liberalismo de la FSSPX puede contar con nuestra ayuda amplificando su voz por la que se opone al liberalismo de sus superiores. Entonces él  pronto ya no estará  más en la (tan llamada) resistencia interna, porque verá rápido la mano de hierro de Menzingen lo aplasta y expulsa tan pronto como empiece a levantarse sin miedo contra el liberalismo de los superiores.
  Cuando eso suceda, los Católicos sin compromiso tendrán una “luz verde” para asistir a sus Misas porque él  también será un soldado de Cristo no comprometido de Cristo Rey

Amitié avec la nouvelle FSSPX

Par le Père Raphael, OSB (Prieur, Monastère Saint Joseph, Colombie)

Monseigneur Lefebvre déclarait : « ce fut le concile et ses fruits qui ont provoqué la destruction de la Sainte Messe, de notre Sainte Foi, de nos catéchismes et de la royauté sociale de Notre Seigneur Jésus Christ » (19 novembre 1989).

Gardons cette citation en tête pour faire une analogie. La Sainte Eglise Catholique est similaire à l’Arbre de Vie (parce qu’elle est la seule source de la vie spirituelle et du salut). La nouvelle religion de Vatican II ressemble à une maladie mortelle qui a progressivement infecté cet Arbre (dans sa partie humaine) depuis le concile.

Sigue leyendo

Friendship with the New-SSPX?

By Fr. Raphael, OSB (Prior, San José Monastery, Colombia)

Monsignor Lefebvre stated: It was the council and its FRUITS that caused the destruction of the Holy Mass, our Holy Faith, our catechisms and the social kingdom of Our Lord Jesus Christ (19 November 1989).

With this quote in mind, let us make an analogy. The Holy Catholic Church is like the Tree of Life (because It is the only source of spiritual life and salvation). The new religion of Vatican II is like a deadly disease which has progressively infected this Tree (in Its human element) ever since the council.

This conciliar disease attacks the whole Tree (in Its human element) and countless enemies labor with the conscious intent to destroy the Tree. The disease is in the Tree but it is not a product of the Tree. This is like the fact that the conciliar church infects the human element of the Catholic Church from within (like a virus does in a body). Then the infected Catholics are like “copies” of the “virus” which further spread the infection by using the Tree’s own structure (Catholic authority and the hierarchy now occupied by liberals).

The conciliar popes are most responsible for caring for the Tree of Life but instead they are working hard to further infect this Tree with the deadly disease. These popes should “spray” the Tree with “herbicide” to kill the disease, viz., clearly condemning errors and strongly resisting the Church’s enemies. These popes should also “feed” and “water” the Tree of Life (in Its human element), with Traditional Catholic doctrine and the True Sacraments. Instead, these popes prevent the Tree (in Its human element) from receiving most nutrition and hydration.

Many in the so-called “internal resistance” of the SSPX desire to “water” the Tree but their work is in vain because they fail in their duty to also fight the invading disease. This is like, when a citadel is besieged, those within the citadel fail in their duty if they merely plant gardens and feed the livestock! They must fight against the invaders, with all their might!

As our Lord’s conciliar enemies (Rome) further “infect” the Tree (in Its human element), the new-SSPX treats them as if they were fighting on our Lord’s side and approaches them in friendship without first demanding their conversion. By not resisting the disease being spread, the new-SSPX is cooperating in the destruction of the Tree and is thereby helping our Lord’s enemies. Even leaving aside the new-SSPX’s own affirmative liberalism, the new-SSPX is cooperating with the destroyers by omission.

Every SSPX priest now scandalizes the faithful by the very fact of his membership in, and cooperation with, the liberal SSPX, because his membership, assistance and cooperation indicate to the world that he condones and endorses the group and what it now stands for. This is like the scandal a person causes being a member of the Communist Party, even if he rationalizes his membership by thinking of himself as part of the Party’s “internal resistance”. Even if an SSPX priest indicates to some persons that he disagrees with certain SSPX positions, this is not enough because that SSPX priest is counted, listed and identified internationally as part of the SSPX. Therefore, the priest is regarded internationally as supporting and cooperating with the new-SSPX.

Besides the scandal caused simply by membership, the SSPX priests of the so-called “internal resistance” fail in the duty of every priest and every Catholic to completely resist the disease (modernism, ecumenism, liberalism, etc.), and use his maximum efforts to protect the whole Tree (the Common Good of the whole Church) and not merely protect his own friends or his own little parish (his own little “branch” of the Tree). Some in the so-called “internal resistance” of the SSPX do “speak out”, but they speak quietly and timidly enough so that they are tolerated by their liberal SSPX superiors.

Uncompromising Catholics must consider this as a “red light” to attending the Masses of all SSPX priests because they all cooperate with our Lord’s enemies at least by being members of the new-SSPX and also by softening their opposition to SSPX liberalism to the lower level tolerated by their SSPX superiors. Any SSPX priest who believes that he is speaking out strongly, loudly and continually against the liberalism of his SSPX superiors, is fooling himself.

Any priest who fearlessly stands against SSPX liberalism can count on our help amplifying his voice by which he opposes his superiors’ liberalism. Then he will soon no longer be in the (so-called) internal resistance because he will see how fast the iron fist of Menzingen crushes and expels him as soon as he begins to really make a difference by standing fearlessly against his superiors’ liberalism.

At that time, uncompromising Catholics will have a “green light” to attend his Masses because then he also will be an uncompromising soldier of Christ the King.

We Should Never Attend the New Mass

By Fr. Raphael, OSB (Prior, San José Monastery, Colombia)

We can see on the level of principle that the new mass is always evil since it is a fruit implementing the modernist heresy, and which ultimately ends in heresy.

But suppose someone were to say that the new mass is evil but he should attend it because he obtains some good fruits from it. This person would be claiming that there is a good and a bad effect and he attends the new mass despite the bad effect, in order to obtain the good effect. Such a person would be trying to justify his attendance at the new mass by invoking the Principle of Double Effect (also known as the Principle of the Indirect Voluntary).

Under this Principle of Double Effect, an action is permissible despite some bad effect if—and only if—the action fulfills each of four conditions. Otherwise the action must not be performed. These four conditions are:

  1. There must be an immediate necessity to perform such an act;
  2. The intention (of the person doing the act) must be to obtain the good effect and never to obtain the bad effect;
  3. The good effect of the act must occur first or at least simultaneously with the bad effect; and
  4. The good fruit of the act must be proportionally greater than the bad fruit.

Note. These four conditions must all be fulfilled for the act to be morally good. The lack of fulfillment of even one of these conditions makes the act evil and the act is therefore forbidden.

Applying these four conditions to assisting at the new mass, we can easily see that conditions one, three and four are not fulfilled.

The first condition is not fulfilled since a person could fulfill in his home the obligation to sanctify the Sunday, when there is no Tridentine Mass available. Moreover, mass and communion are never immediately necessary (or necessary at all) when they offend God—as does the new mass.

Catholic Candle note: Another example of a mass which offends God is a satanic mass.

The third condition is not fulfilled since the (purported) good effect directly flows from a cause which itself is evil, viz., the heterodox “celebration” of the new mass. This is not a situation where two effects—one good and the other bad—both flow from one neutral cause. Instead, the new mass is itself the evil cause of the (purported) good effect and this evil occurs first and vitiates all which flows from it.

The fourth condition is also not fulfilled since the new rite is not Catholic and therefore endangers the Faith. It is objectively a sin against the First and Second Commandments (and other Commandments). Further, the end does not justify the means. One must choose death rather than commit a sin. Therefore there is no proportion between the evil of assisting at a new mass and the (supposed) good effect. This means no one should ever attend the new mass.

Lastly, a person might wrongly suppose that “there is some good part of the new mass” because the new mass contains the Our Father (etc.). But the new mass is evil in all cases and participating in any of its parts is evil as they exist as parts of this evil whole.

God is offended by mixing things that belong to Him, e.g., the Our Father, with other things that belong to the devil, e.g., the new mass. Thus, although reciting the Our Father is good when this is done separated from everything conciliar, God is offended by reciting the Our Father as part of the sacrilegious new mass. This is like the fact that He is offended by reciting the Our Father as part of a (heretical) Lutheran service. (This is why Catholics are forbidden to participate in even this part of a Lutheran service.) We must stay away from the new mass and its parts.

I am obliged to speak out about this subject due to the gravity of the error now being publicly spread, which is scandalizing Catholics. This error betrays the truth in our battle for the defense of our Faith and the glory and honor of Christ the King.

—Fr. Raphael, OSB (Prior, Colombia)